### Thursday, March 14, 2019

**Mihai Prunescu (University of Bucharest)
Lindström's Theorems
**

**Abstract**: Regular logic systems which are strictly stronger than the first order predicate calculus cannot satisfy in the same time Löwenheim-Skolem for statements and compacity (Lindström 1). Effectively presented such systems cannot satisfy in the same time Löwenheim-Skolem for statements and the condition that the set of generally valid sentences is recursively enumerable (Lindström 2). We sketch the proof that uses partial isomorphisms.

References:

[1] H.-D. Ebbinghaus, J. Flum, W. Thomas, Mathematical Logic. Second edition, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 1996.

### Thursday, February 28, 2019

**Natalia Moangă (University of Bucharest)
The hybridization of many-sorted polyadic modal logic
**

**Abstract**: Hybrid logics are obtained by enriching modal logics with nominals and state variables, that directly refer the individual points in a Kripke model. In the present work we develop a hybrid version on top of our many-sorted polyadic logic, previously defined. Our system has nominals and state variables on each sort, as well as binders that act like the universal and the existential quantfiers on state variables. In doing this, we follow various approaches for hybrid modal logic, especially the work of Blackburn and Tsakova.

**Alexandru Dragomir (University of Bucharest)
An introduction to BAN logic (a logic of authentication)
**

**Abstract**: One of the first and most discussed logical approaches to the problem of verifying security protocols is the one proposed in BAN logic (Burrows, Abadi & Needham 1989), a many-sorted modal logic used for its intuitive and compelling set of inference rules devised for reasoning about an agent’s beliefs, trust and message exchange. My presentation will focus on (1) presenting the language and inference rules of BAN logic, (2) following the original paper's analysis of the Otway-Rees protocol, (3) presenting some objections to using BAN, and (4) discussing the problem of offering a semantics of BAN logic.

### Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 10:00 in Hall 214

**Cătălin Dima (Université Paris-Est Créteil)
The frontier between decidability and undecidability for logics for strategic reasoning in the presence of imperfect information
**

**Abstract**: The last 15-20 years have seen a number of logical formalisms that focus on strategic reasoning. These logics aim at giving specification languages for various multi-agent game structures, in which agents have adversarial or cooperative objectives which may be qualitative or quantitative and may have various types of imperfect information. The presence of imperfect information raises a particular difficulty in that many games cannot be solved algorithmically, as well as their corresponding logical formalisms. In this tutorial I will review some techniques for proving that the Alternating-time Temporal Logic has an undecidable model-checking problem, but this problem becomes decidable when considering memoryless strategies, coalitions with distributed knowledge, hierarchical knowledge and public or coalition-public announcements. I will also give a short introduction to the model-checking tool MCMAS which relies on the memoryless semantics for ATL with imperfect information, and the problems that arise when implementing the model-checking algorithms for this case.

### Thursday, December 20, 2018

**Andrei Sipoș (TU Darmstadt & IMAR)
The finitary content of sunny nonexpansive retractions
**

**Abstract**: The goal of proof mining is to extract quantitative information out of proofs in mainstream mathematics which are not necessarily fully constructive. Often, such proofs make use of strong mathematical principles, but a preliminary analysis may show that they are not actually needed, so the proof may be carried out in a system of strength corresponding roughly to first-order arithmetic. Following a number of significant advances in this vein by Kohlenbach in 2011 and by Kohlenbach and Leuștean in 2012, we now tackle a long-standing open question: the quantitative analysis of the strong convergence of resolvents in classes of Banach spaces more general than Hilbert spaces.

This result was proven for the class of uniformly smooth Banach spaces by Reich in 1980. What we do is to analyze a proof given in 1990 by Morales, showing that adding the hypothesis of the space being uniformly convex, and thus still covering the case of $L^p$ spaces, can serve to eliminate the strongest principles used in the proof by way of a modulus of convexity for the squared norm of such spaces. A further procedure of arithmetization brings the proof down to System $T$ so the proper analysis may proceed. After obtaining a non-effective realizer of the metastability statement, this is majorized in order to obtain the desired rate. Subsequent considerations calibrate this bound to $T_1$. It particular, this result completes some analyses that had previously been obtained only partially, yielding rates of metastability within the above-considered class of Banach spaces for the Halpern and Bruck iterations.

These results are joint work with Ulrich Kohlenbach.

References:

[1] U. Kohlenbach, A. Sipoș, The finitary content of sunny nonexpansive retractions, arXiv:1812.04940 [math.FA], 2018.

### Thursday, December 6, 2018

**Roberto Giuntini (University of Cagliari)
Classical and quantum degrees of truth: a new look at the effects of a Hilbert space
**

**Abstract**: We investigate certain Brouwer-Zadeh lattices that serve as abstract counterparts of lattices of effects in Hilbert spaces under the spectral ordering. These algebras, called $PBZ^*$-lattices, can also be seen as generalisations of orthomodular lattices and are remarkable for the collapse of three notions of “sharpness” that are distinct in general Brouwer-Zadeh lattices. We investigate the structure theory of $PBZ^*$-lattices and their reducts; in particular, we prove some embedding results for $PBZ^*$-lattices and provide an initial description of the lattice of $PBZ^*$-varieties.